Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Journal of Health Administration. 2013; 16 (52): 61-72
in Persian | IMEMR | ID: emr-183537

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Owing to the critical importance of emergency department activities in saving lives, information systems of this department should be free of fault to prevent the incidence of errors. Usability evaluation methods are used to assess this quality measure. Heuristic evaluation is one of the methods which identifies usability problems with minimum amount of time, cost and resources. The objective of this research was to evaluate the usability of emergency department admission subsystem of health information systems in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences


Methods: Using Nielsen's 10 usability principles, three trained evaluators, independent of each other, evaluated the corresponding subsystem and determined the severity of identified problems. All the problems, identified by independent evaluators, were collected in a single list and the mean severity of each problem was calculated


Results: A total of 163 usability problems were identified. The lowest mismatch with usability principles was related to "error prevention" [3 %] and the highest was related to "consistency and standards" [27 %]. The average severity of problems varied from 2.3 [minor problem] concerning "system's visibility" to 2.9 [major problem] concerning "help users recognize, diagnose, and recover from errors"


Conclusion: Heuristic Evaluation can be used to identify a high number of usability problems related to health information applications in health care systems. If remain unsolved, these problems may waste users' and patients' time, increase errors, reduce data quality, and in general, threaten patient's safety

2.
Journal of Health Administration. 2013; 16 (54): 34-45
in Persian | IMEMR | ID: emr-183551

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Using data mining to develop prediction models from large amounts of data in medicine has become increasingly popular during the recent years. In this study, we intend to use a decision tree data mining algorithm in order to identify factors influencing mortality in burn patients


Methods: The present retrospective descriptive study is based on burning patients' records. Overall, the medical records of 4804 patients were scrutinized. The collected data were analyzed using statistical software [SPSS version 16], data mining software [Clementine version 12], and CHAID algorithm


Results: The resulting model for predicting survival and mortality of burning patients included the percentage of Total Burn Surface Area [TBSA %], degree of burn, length of stay, gender, and age of patients. Other variables including blood cultures, wound cultures, urine cultures, and the months of patient hospitalization had no effect on improving the efficiency of the model


Conclusion: The proposed model is valid and reliable due to its accuracy [approximately 95%]. In fact, the results of this study, some of which are consistent with the results of other studies, can propose a comprehensive, accurate, and reliable local model for predicting mortality and survival of burning patients based on the mentioned variables. Thus, this local model can be used as an important criterion for evaluating the effective treatment of burn patients

3.
Scientific Medical Journal. 2011; 9 (6): 615-623
in English, Persian | IMEMR | ID: emr-104133

ABSTRACT

Evaluation of medical records departments in hospitals of Iran shows that these departments have not achieved desirable standards and high quality services. The major aim of this survey is to evaluate the performance of the Medical Records Departments of hospitals of Ahvaz for awareness of their status. This is an applied research, conducted in descriptive cross-sectional. Research population includes medical records departments of hospitals Imam Khomeini, Golestan, Razi, Aboozar, Shafa, Taleghani, Salamat and Sina. In this study the required data has been collected by the use of a questionnaire and four types of check-lists in each of Admission, Filing, Coding and statistics units. To analyze of data, each four checklists of units was assigned 100 score and then the performance average of each unit was calculated and compared. The best performance was for statistics units [71.97%] and lowest it was for coding units [56.79%]. Functional status standards were partially observed. Auditing results show that the functional status in medical records departments of university hospitals in Ahvaz lack standard instructions that should be followed on all the functional processes and require appropriate attention by trustees of these hospitals

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL